By: Orin Kerr
Thanks for the ***, Dave. (That is, star footnote #3, not unprintable-word-with-three-letters.)
View ArticleBy: Brett Bellmore
That’s probably the clearest expression I’ve ever seen of the fundamental divide in attitudes towards voting: Voting as a decision making procedure, where uninformed voters are undesirable noise in the...
View ArticleBy: Scott Moss
Durn… that’s a good cautionary note for those of us (like me) prone to spouting off on any old topic. Supporting what you say: when I wrote some op-eds in the past year on quasi-political legal topics,...
View ArticleBy: Carol Cross
The fundamental divide on the attitude toward voting was tested, huh! —so many voting for policies and change that they perceive to be their best interests! Even those “lower middle class citizens who...
View ArticleBy: Carol Cross
The fundamental divide on the attitude toward voting was tested, huh! —so many voting for policies and change that they perceive to be their best interests! Even those “lower middle class citizens who...
View ArticleBy: Kevin
I think this post makes two contestable assumptions: 1) Blogging by law profs should be about subjects they have expertise on. 2) If a more political dialogue begins, it can only be a “contribution” if...
View ArticleBy: dave hoffman
Kevin, Yes, I acknowledge that point in the post. I value civility more than you, I guess, and that makes me just as vague as some of what I’m commenting about. Also, tactics matter. My goal was to...
View ArticleBy: Carolyn Elefant
I read posts from about 300 different blogs several times a week to cull material for Law.com’s Legal Blogwatch (www.legalblogwatch.typepad.com) To be honest, many law professor blogs are nothing more...
View ArticleBy: Quidpro
Bravo, Professor Hoffman. As one who comes from a more conservative orientation, I recognize the benefits from visiting liberal blogs. Conversation with one’s political adversaries creates space for...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....